WireJuly 31, 2026 at 10:30 PM
Loading the next story…
The confirmation of Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche remains stalled in the Senate, caught in a dispute between President Trump and key Republican senators over a proposed “anti-weaponization” compensation fund that critics warn could expose American taxpayers to massive, open-ended liability.
Sens. John Cornyn (R-Texas) and Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) have drawn a firm line, refusing to advance Blanche’s nomination until the Department of Justice provides written assurance that the fund is dead. Despite President Trump stating the fund is defunct, he simultaneously expressed regret over its demise, stating he wished individuals “horribly treated, horribly abused” by the government were compensated. This mixed messaging from the White House has deepened the impasse, with Tillis publicly retorting that the president’s comments indicate the fund “is still alive” and vowing to prevent any “misallocation of taxpayer dollars.”
Senator Cornyn amplified the concern, sharing a post noting that Trump’s language did not sound like a definitive termination of the program. The standoff highlights a core tenet of economic nationalism: the protection of domestic workers’ tax contributions from vaguely defined government payouts that serve narrow political interests rather than the national good.
The administration has increased pressure, with Secretary of State Marco Rubio demanding the Senate not recess without a confirmation vote and the White House releasing a statement calling for approval “without delay.” The statement leaned on endorsements from law enforcement groups and former DOJ officials.
“I will continue working in good faith to put an end to this legal and political albatross,” Senator Tillis stated, confirming that Blanche had been forthright in private discussions regarding the fund.
Meanwhile, President Trump’s legal team announced an appeal of a federal judge’s order that scuttled a settlement dropping an IRS lawsuit against the government. The judge previously described the lawsuit as a “bad faith” maneuver, a ruling that further complicates the debate over executive branch litigation and the proposed compensation mechanism at the heart of the Blanche fight.