On Thursday night, Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) expired for the first time in its history, leaving U.S. intelligence agencies without a critical legal framework for collecting foreign intelligence while safeguarding American privacy rights. The House failed to pass a three-week extension, with the vote falling short at 198 to 218, well below the two-thirds majority required. Nineteen Republicans and most Democrats opposed the measure, citing concerns over the lack of Senate-confirmed leadership in the intelligence community.

Partisan Divide Halts Surveillance Authority

The Democratic opposition was largely driven by President Trump’s recent appointment of Bill Pulte, head of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, as acting Director of National Intelligence. Pulte, who lacks national security or intelligence experience, became a lightning rod for criticism. Democrats argued they could not support extending Section 702 under his oversight, even as President Trump nominated Jay Clayton, U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, as permanent DNI. However, this nomination does not address the immediate lapse in authority.

‘Pulte’s gotta go,’ Senator Chuck Schumer said, emphasizing the need for credible leadership in national intelligence.

Impact on National Security

Section 702 has been integral to U.S. intelligence operations, accounting for roughly 25% of NSA reporting and over half of the President’s Daily Brief. It has played a role in thwarting terrorist plots, including the 2009 NYC subway bombing and the 2022 operation targeting al-Qaeda’s Ayman al-Zawahiri. Without this authority, intelligence agencies must now make case-by-case judgments, risking potential intelligence gaps or privacy violations.

The expiration comes at a critical time, with millions of visitors expected for the World Cup and heightened global security concerns. Critics argue that Congress’s failure to act prioritizes partisan politics over national security, leaving the country exposed to avoidable risks.