Congressional Republicans are escalating their pushback against former President Donald Trump's influence, particularly regarding his proposed $1.8 billion 'anti-weaponization' fund. The fund, which critics describe as a 'kryptonite' for GOP lawmakers, is facing scrutiny over its lack of legal precedent and accountability.
Legislative Scrutiny Intensifies
During a closed-door Senate GOP lunch on Wednesday, questions about the fund's origins and intended recipients were repeatedly raised. Sen. Mike Rounds (R-S.D.) acknowledged that lawmakers are seeking to address these concerns, stating that 'there's going to be an attempt to address the questions that are out there on it.' Outgoing Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.) went further, labeling the fund as a '$1.8 billion slush fund for the President and his allies to pay whomever they wish.'
'A yes-man mentality, it's not good for the president, it's not good for our party, not good for Congress,' retiring Rep. Don Bacon (R-Neb.) told reporters.
House Republicans Join the Pushback
In the House, Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick (R-Pa.) announced his intention to 'try to kill' the fund, while Rep. Kevin Kiley (R-Calif.) signaled he would likely support a discharge petition to impose restrictions on it. House Speaker Mike Johnson, however, downplayed concerns about party unity, urging lawmakers to prioritize collective decision-making over personal preferences.
What's Next?
Senate GOP leaders are expected to release the text of a $70 billion funding package for ICE and Border Patrol, aimed at addressing border security for the next 3 1/2 years. Democrats are preparing amendments to restrict the controversial fund, setting the stage for a contentious vote-a-rama as early as Thursday.