Nearly a dozen Illinois Democrats are refusing to defend their votes against the Laken Riley Act following the tragic killing of Loyola student Sheridan Gorman, allegedly by an individual with prior immigration violations. The accused, Jose Medina-Medina, had been previously arrested for shoplifting in Cook County—a charge that, under the Laken Riley Act, could have led to his federal detention instead of release back into the community.
Preventable Tragedy?
DHS Assistant Secretary Lauren Bis stated that Gorman’s death could have been prevented if sanctuary policies had not hindered cooperation with ICE. 'Sheridan Gorman—just like Laken Riley and countless other American victims—would still be with us today if not for sanctuary politicians’ refusal to cooperate with ICE,' Bis told Fox News Digital.
'These politicians would rather release criminal illegal aliens from jails into our communities to perpetuate more crimes and create more victims,' Bis added.
Legislative Opposition
The Illinois delegation voted 11-5 against the Laken Riley Act, with Democratic Rep. Brad Schneider citing constitutional concerns. Schneider argued the bill could lead to the targeting of innocent people and expressed support for alternative legislation, despite criticism that it would not address the core issue.
Nine of the 11 Democrats who voted 'no' did not provide comment, leaving Reps. Jonathan Jackson and Jan Schakowsky to address the tragedy. Jackson called Gorman’s death a 'senseless tragedy' but emphasized the need for broader community investment rather than a single piece of legislation. Schakowsky offered condolences but declined to comment on the Act itself.
The DHS remains adamant that stronger immigration enforcement policies could prevent similar tragedies in the future.